http://www.uticaod.com/article/20150311/OPINION/150319907/2011/?Start=1#sthash.ImZMlvTZ.dpuf
Since I have been doing engineering technical design for 28 years, it is important to be accurate with numbers and calculations else bridges collapse and buildings fall over. I believe the facts the good colonel is leaving out is that those 1 watt radars are actually high gain (35 dBi) pulsed units with what I believe are peak pulsed power of 1000 watts ea – see linked documents – they typically pulse on for ~1/1000 of each second (so the “average” power is low – 1 watt) and according to the article below can reach 300 miles and jam civilian aircraft. These are NOT EVEN CLOSE to the same power as TV antennas due to the high gain, they are like focused flashlight beams.
So lets say 5 of the 1kW (1000 watt peak) antenna beams are overlapping:
5000 watt overlapping pulsed radars @ gain=35 dBi = 15,811,388 Watts of Effective Isotropic Radiated Power.
Check my Math:
http://www.satcomresources.com/ERP-EIRP-Converter
TV Antenna Effective Isotropic Radiated Power: (Colonel) 50,000 Watts
5 Newport 1 kW Peak Pulsed (1 watt avg) Antennas Effective Isotropic Radiated Power: : 15,811,388 Watts
So 5 overlapping Newport antennas are equivalent to 316 TV Station antennas, which is why the civilian aircraft were jammed from 300 MILES AWAY.
http://fcw.com/articles/1998/04/12/rogue-transmitter-knocks-out-gps-signals.aspx
I believe it is the 15 million+ EIRP watts of overlapping peak pulsed watts emanating from the Newport antenna facility that is making everybody sick. YOU CANNOT JAM A CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT FROM 300 MILES AWAY WITH A 1 WATT ANTENNA. THEY ARE BEING VERY DECEPTIVE AND NOT COMPARING APPLES TO APPLES.
Equivalent Isotropic Radiative Power of 5 overlapping 1000 watt pulsed radar antennas
Typical Pulsed Radar EIRP Watts (Most are in the Gigawatts)
From the Colonel: “Likewise, power density from a nearby WI-FI access point (home router) transmitting at 50 mw (typical) would be over a million times stronger”
Hey guys! I was talking with one of my engineer friends. Ask the Colonel how he gets his antennas, which are a “million times” less powerful than a WiFi router to transmit a few miles across the hilltops in Newport, NY. Because my WiFi router at home barely reaches through the house! Or better yet, ask him how his “million times” less powerful antennas can JAM CIVILIAN AIRCRAFT 300 MILES AWAY because they forgot and left them on for 3 weeks. Quick everyone turn off their WiFi routers! You may be jamming civilian aircraft!
http://fcw.com/articles/1998/04/12/rogue-transmitter-knocks-out-gps-signals.aspx #sthash.ImZMlvTZ.dpuf
WAKE UP! GET REAL! ASK YOUR KID! DOES HE HAVE REAL ESTATE IN THE EVERGLADES HE WANTS TO SELL YOU?
TV Station EIRP: 50,000 watts
5 Newport Radars EIRP: 15,811,388 watts (1000 watts pulsed @ 35 dBi gain)
References:
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a347013.pdf
https://www.scribd.com/doc/220629058/Multipath-Effects-on-F-15-and-F-16-Multi-channel-GPS-Antenna-Performance
MY 11 YEAR OLD SAYS EPIC FAILURE!
Ask Dr. Hawking!
Has anybody heard from this guy?…
P.S., I have all the respect in the world for the military protecting our freedom, I just think the dumbass electrical engineers are cooking us all a bit with all those high power, high gain pulsed radars and are not completely aware of it. I have a good friend who is an x-military pilot and he said you hire the air force when you want to “break something” from the air….
GUEST VIEW: Newport towers pale compared to other transmitters
See more at: http://www.uticaod.com/article/20150311/OPINION/150319907/2011/?Start=1#sthash.uaBUS1pr.dpuf
We have followed closely the Observer-Dispatch’s reporting on the Newport Antenna Measurement Facility. Following your initial Feb. 26 news story, we were surprised your reporter didn’t ask us a single question about the site. So we reached out to her to ensure she knew how to contact us and to let her know we were more than willing to discuss the work there.
There was no response.
Then, we read the March 5 editorial, “Push for answers on radar.” We can only assume your paper’s search for answers was less than exhaustive because we still haven’t been asked about the site.
Nonetheless, we are happy to provide answers to you and your readers.
Let us start with what the site is not. We do incredibly important work at Newport, but it isn’t “military-grade radar” and it doesn’t “emit various frequencies of electromagnetic radiation testing the latest electronic warfare technology.” It would be unsafe to conduct such research near populated areas. In addition, security would mandate such highly classified testing on electronic warfare be conducted far from prying eyes.
The Newport site actually consists of a series of small-power radios that transmit at a maximum power of 1 watt. These radios transmit signals to aircraft shells mounted on positioning towers that enable us to mimic different aspects of flight. This allows us to measure how well the aircraft antennas receive low power signals. We found late in the Vietnam War that an F-4 fighter loaded with bombs could lose radio contact when it banked at certain angles. The Newport facility ensures we don’t have similar issues with modern aircraft.
For the purposes of comparison, our 1-watt transmitters deliver a fraction of the power of a 50,000 watt television transmitter in the area that beams around the clock. A typical cell phone next to one’s ear is almost 6 million times stronger than the Tanner Hill transmitter. Likewise, power density from a nearby WI-FI access point (home router) transmitting at 50 mw (typical) would be over a million times stronger at a distance of 1 meter.
We sympathize deeply with the families who are suffering. And we agree they deserve a full investigation. They deserve answers. To this end, we sent an unsolicited letter offering assistance to the New York State Department of Health. We invited them to visit the site if they feel that would be beneficial to their study.
We would be happy to extend the same invitation to the authors of this editorial.
The Information Directorate at Rome Research Site plays a vital role in delivering a superior technical advantage for our Air Force in the information domain. We want our Airmen to be “smarter” than our adversary at every juncture. The Newport site plays a vital role in helping us understand how to best deliver information to our pilots in the aircraft. That knowledge is crucial, especially on the modern battlefield.
Page 2 of 2 – Col. David P. Blanks is commander of the Rome Research Site and Deputy Director of the Information Directorate.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The O-D reporter was contacted after the Feb. 26 story by an Air Force official from Ohio who said he oversees the Newport towers.
He told the reporter that the Newport system only puts out signals at about 1 watt. She then went back to her source, who provided documentation showing that in 2005 – at least – there was electronic warfare testing in Newport and it was at about 30,000 watts.
The O-D editorial board, meanwhile, was contacted by a representative of the CNY Defense Alliance concerning the Feb. 26 report and was told that the Air Force Research Lab Public Affairs office would forward contact information since personnel at Rome Lab are not authorized to talk with the media. That contact information was not provided.
Further, a request asking for attribution of an email discussing RF (radio frequency) power density at the Newport site was never acknowledged.
Comments
The Gentlemen implies they only tested the F-35 AESA antennas as receivers, receiving only 1 watt of power. This article mentions they also tested the F-35’s multiple antennas for antenna to antenna isolation, to see if one antenna will “drown out” or “overwhelm” the other antenna(s) In order to do that you have to place the AESA radar antennas in transmit mode. The AN/APG-81 radar can pulse up to 30,000 watts of power @ approx gain of 45, possibly higher
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/systems/an-apg-aesa.htm
http://www.f-16.net/f-35-news-article1250.html
The F-35 model will also be used to measure antenna-to-antenna isolation measurements to support F-35 radio frequency (RF) compatibility verification. The model weighs 8,500 pounds and was produced over a 44-week period. With interchangeable wing and tail components, it has the capability to simulate all three F-35 variants.
http://www.wirelessweek.com/articles/2013/12/antenna-isolation-testing-systems-multiple-radios
The issue – transmitting antennas drown each other out
Whenever two antennas are physically close together, radio frequency isolation decreases between those antennas and the antennas can “hear” each other better. The problem occurs when one of those antennas is transmitting, while the other antenna is receiving or transmitting. In situations where, the antennas are both receiving only, there is usually no problem. The challenge is if one antenna or more is a transmitter. In this scenario, the transmitter(s) degrade receiver performance, and can interfere with other radio systems and/or cause certification problems such as radiated spurious emissions (RSE).
TV Antenna EIRP Watts: 50,000
F-35 AESA AN/APG-81 Radar EIRP Watts: 948,682,741
The insult to everyone’s intelligence that reads this article is that the military is implying their latest F-35 fighter with electronic warfare capabilities that was tested at Newport, NY starting in 2005, only uses one watt of power to disable and jam enemy radars from miles away…
That is laughable
From: ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme911@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 11:14 AM
To: MAYER, DARYL W GS-13 USAF AFMC 88 ABW/PA
Subject: Re: Requests for information on Newport Antenna Test Facility
Daryl,
As you know I am one of the professionals helping the Mothers in Newport, NY collect information on potential environmental triggers for the recognized cancer/disease cluster in children & adults in/around Newport, NY. This will include sources of ionizing radiation as well as non-ionizing radiation such as that emitted from the Newport antenna radiation test site. To be more specific , we are looking for any sources of public information over the past 30-40 years regarding:
1. Antenna Radiation Test Dates/Durations
2. Antenna Radiation Patterns
3. Antenna Power
4. Antenna Gain
5. Antenna EIRP (effective isotropic radiated power)
6. Antenna Duty Cycle, including Pulse Repetition factor (PRF), Pulse Duration, etc.
7. Antenna targets and distances (on the hilltops and in the air)
8. Directional antenna beamwidths and beam directions
9. Antenna Make/Model/Phased Array/Parabolic
10. Radiation power levels detected at Newport Rd (approx. 2000 feet below) and the surrounding area. Radiation levels should not just include average power but peak pulsed power.
11. Radiation levels detected at/around the RF fencing below the test sites.
Pulsed electromagnetic radiation has recently been linked with increased disease
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21716201
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23852905
“For the purposes of comparison, our 1-watt transmitters deliver a fraction of the power of a 50,000 watt television transmitter in the area that beams around the clock.” THEY FORGOT TO MENTION THE 30,000 watt F-35 AESA RADAR PACKAGE TESTED ABOUT 2005. [A TV ANTENNA IS AN ISOTROPIC RADIATOR, NOT EVEN A CLOSE COMPARISON- IT RADIATES IN ALL DIRECTIONS. AN F-35 AESA RADAR IS A HIGH GAIN, HIGHLY FOCUSED MILITARY RADAR]
http://www.f-16.net/f-35-news-article1250.html
November 12, 2004 (by Lieven Dewitte) – Multi-phase Mission Systems aperture testing is under way on a full-scale model of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter at the Air Force Research Laboratories’ Newport, N.Y., test facility.
The model, manufactured by Advanced Technologies, Inc., of Newport News, Va., is being used to measure installed antenna pattern, gain and phase measurements for the F-35’s Communication, Navigation & Identification (CNI) and Electronic Warfare (EW) systems.
The aperture test program, a major Mission Systems development milestone, began on Oct. 1 with testing of the CNI system’s upper L-Band antennas from Ball Aerospace. Early test results show the pre-production apertures meet or exceed pattern and gain requirements while installed in the F-35 model. Additional tests are evaluating the performance of the CNI system’s Satellite Communications, Global Positioning System and UHF/VHF communications apertures. EW aperture testing will begin in 2005.
F-35 EW AESA Radar Antenna: 30,000 Peak Pulsed Watts
GAIN (est.): 45 dBi
Effective Isotropic Radiatiated Power (EIRP): 94,8682,741 WATTS
THAT IS 95 MILLION WATTS EQUIVALENT OF FOCUSED POWER. THAT IS 1900 TIMES MORE POWERFUL. THAT IS WHAT I BELIEVE IS MAKING YOUR CHILDREN SICK. NOW DID THEY TEST IT LIKE THE ARTICLE SAYS OR NOT?
@ Sorry, put my comma in the wrong place
EIRP: 948,682,741 Watts !!!!
That is 19,000 times higher equivalent isotropic power than his isotropic TV antenna example.
Check my math:
http://www.csgnetwork.com/antennaecalc.html
Click here to see EIRP of some other military/weather radars, most are in the Gigawatts:
http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/media/33251/tutorial_c_slides.pdf
“He told the reporter that the Newport system only puts out signals at about 1 watt” THAT IS NOT A CORRECT STATEMENT
They are actually telling you an average power from 1996 which averages in the time the radar is turned off in between pulses. That is like telling you your Ferrari only puts out 10 HP because you average in the time it is turned off sitting in the garage.
http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a347013.pdf
Both low power (<25 watts) and high power pulsed TWT’s have been discussed for use in
future experiments. The low power transmitter is used primarily with a fixed antenna for receiver
calibration and equalization. The 1 kW (peak)[1000 watts] pulsed TWT uses a steerable 10 foot dish to
provide signals for local experiments.
The 10 foot dish antenna will further boost the signal due to the gain of the parabolic dish
“Then, we read the March 5 editorial, “Push for answers on radar.” We can only assume your paper’s search for answers was less than exhaustive because we still haven’t been asked about the site.” THIS IS NOT A TRUE STATEMENT
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: ChemE Stewart <cheme911@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:53 PM
Subject: Newport, NY Antenna Test Facility
To: john.derosa@rl.af.mil
Hi John,
Do you know where online I can find the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Newport, NY antenna/radar test facility. Usually there is one filed with the State/Federal Government
Thanks
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: ChemE Stewart <cheme911@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: Newport, NY Antenna Test Facility
To: john.derosa@rl.af.mil
John,
Your email is listed online as the contact for the Rome Air Force and Newport, NY antenna radiation test facility. I am helping some mothers with an environmental study in Newport, NY. Do you know if there was ever an environmental impact assessment done/filed for the Newport Test Facility? It may not have required one but I would like to verify.
Second request.
From: MAYER, DARYL W GS-13 USAF AFMC 88 ABW/PA <daryl.mayer@us.af.mil>
Date: Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:40 PM
Subject: Requests for information on Newport Antenna Test Facility
To: “cheme911@gmail.com” <cheme911@gmail.com>
Sir,
I’m told you’ve been looking for information on the Newport Antenna Test
Facility. I’m in the Public Affairs Office at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio
which is where Air Force Research Laboratory is headquartered. We have the
responsibility for supporting AFRL and the Rome Research Site in your area
Dr. Hawking, Do You Have a Clue?
This child came down with Doose Syndrome, a form of epilepsy, shortly after visiting a military base with aircraft and lots of RADARS
Posted Mar. 7, 2015 at 11:43 AM
HERKIMER
Typically focused on issues related to hunger, poverty and fire prevention, the Herkimer County Hunger Coalition on Wednesday night added a new concern to its list: children with life-threatening illnesses.
Specifically, the coalition expressed support for the Facebook group Kuyahoora Valley – What’s Making Us Sick? and for Mackenzie Kulawy.
Kulawy is a New York Mills child who has Doose syndrome and experiences multiple seizures every day. Others with the syndrome have benefited from medical marijuana.
The Kuyahoora Valley group — which represents Newport, Middleville, Norway, Fairfield, Poland and Cold Brook — has been working to get answers since six children developed pediatric cancers between spring 2011 and summer 2013. It’s something the Department of Health agreed is “statistically unlikely to be due to chance.”
“At the very least, parents with children suffering life-threatening illnesses have the right to know why,” coalition founder Ray Lenarcic said.
The coalition called on Assemblyman Marc Butler, R-Newport, to do several things, such as:
* Find out why the state’s medical marijuana bill, passed last July, won’t be implemented until 2016 and whether the process can be sped up.
* Request that the state Department of Environmental Conservation also get involved in looking into potential problem areas in the Kuyahoora Valley.
* Request the federal government produce records of the testing at the Newport Antenna Measurement Facility to clear up what levels of electromagnetic radiation are being used.
A brochure released by the testing facility details the frequency ranges of the eight towers sitting along Irish and Tanner hills but doesn’t mention the wattage used for “measuring the effects of airframe features … on aircraft antenna radiation patterns in a simulated flight environment.” [Don’t forget to ask about gain and duty cycles of the radiation]
Recently, the Kuyahoora Valley group started a change.org petition — which can be found by searching for “Newport antenna” on the website — calling for testing to stop until an assessment of the facility has been completed.
More than 1,200 people have signed it.
Butler couldn’t be reached, but Lenarcic said he “accepted the challenge” and for that, the coalition is “grateful.”
“We don’t usually take up political issues,” Lenarcic said. “But we’re dealing with issues that involve pain and suffering for parents and children alike.”
– See more at: http://m.uticaod.com/article/20150307/NEWS/150309463/0/SEARCH#sthash.0TLzeFct.dpuf
This Cached page can be found here. It was removed from the radar companies website shortly after I linked to it in 2013. They probably figured it was a bad marketing strategy to implicate your own industry in causing cancer!
Our weather is triggered by vacuum upsets, not hot and cold upsets, that is secondary. BIG DIFFERENCE. Spacetime around us has an extra dimension of stringy curled up space to play with. It is unfolding/inflating around us.
Here is a good paper on quantumly entangled black hole pairs forming wormholes
Once physicists figure our air and water vapor alone cannot do what our atmosphere does, we will be well on our way.
From Terry Lilley in Kauai: The first toby fish is a healthy one that I shot photos of on the south side of Kauai. The other pics are the same species of fish on the north shore of Kauai that were living withing the military testing area for electronic warfare. They are now dead but they gave me the gift to capture their image to show you.
We have stong evidence from the USGS that an electrical shock in water can cause fish to turn black and loose their fins before they die.
We also have data from the US military that their massive amount microwaves they use along the north shore of Kauai can ground out on the reef causing an eletronic shock.
We know that the reefs and marine life along the north shore of Kauai are suffering a massive loss of life way beyond what is happening on other Hawaiian Islands.
Should we connect the dots? No where else in Hawaii are fish turning black and having their fins fall off so maybe we should open our eyes.
At Anini Beach over 30% of the toby fish have massive signs of electrical shock, are turning black and dying.
Just a fact I have more than enough proof of this in HD video if anyone cares.
Tobys are kind gentile creatures and they have been here in Kauai for 5 million years looking like the first picture but now they look like the the following three pictures.
Is this just OK for us humans who have taken over their world?
clearly evident because some of the skin tissue begins to turn black.
And I forgot to mention fish turning black and fins falling off.
Holy Shit
Posted from the Utica Dispatch for educational purposes only:
“Years of hard work by concerned citizens who rallied public support led the state Department of Health to investigate what might be causing an unusual number of rare cancers in Herkimer County’s Kuyahoora Valley. Similar public persistence is needed now to make eight military-grade radar towers in Newport part of that state investigation. – See more at: http://m.uticaod.com/article/20150305/OPINION/150309701/13312/OPINION#sthash.f47IlQwZ.dpuf
Posted Mar. 5, 2015 at 3:15 AM
Years of hard work by concerned citizens who rallied public support led the state Department of Health to investigate what might be causing an unusual number of rare cancers in Herkimer County’s Kuyahoora Valley. The action was prompted after six children in that area developed pediatric cancers between spring 2011 and summer 2013, leading Newport resident Melissa Lowell and the “Kuyahoora Valley — What’s Making Us Sick” Facebook group to push for a state investigation.
Similar public persistence is needed now to make eight military-grade radar towers in Newport part of that state investigation.
The health department’s investigation is expected to take 18 to 24 months. A spokesperson wrote recently in an email that the studies “will involve identification of cases and evaluation of information about possible risk factors.” The spokesperson wouldn’t specifically say whether the department’s investigation will include the radar facility.
It should. And the good people of the Kuyahoora Valley who have dedicated themselves to this issue must remain persistent and insist that the health department be accountable.
The radar towers on Irish and Tanner hills emit various frequencies of electromagnetic radiation, testing the latest electronic warfare technology. Unlike similar testing facilities in the desert that are located many miles from residential neighborhoods, these radars are about three miles from the village of Newport. Some have suggested that they could be a problem.
Stewart Simonson, a chemical engineer from Atlanta, has been studying various radar stations for more than two years. He’s worked to build a database of more than 1,500 stations, which he and others have searched for correlations between the towers and human, as well as animal, disease.
Simonson’s book, “Honey, They Cooked The Kids (Illustrated): How Pulsed Microwave Radars are Destroying all Biology,” claims Doppler microwave radiation from weather, FAA and military radars is being scattered by our atmosphere and irradiating humans as well as all plants and animals, damaging DNA and increasing cancers, autism and other oxidative stress related diseases. He has found that areas around the country with high amounts of chronic wasting disease — in which deer and elk have distinctive brain lesions — often are located close to a high-powered military radar system.
Further, Deborah Kopald an environmental health and public policy consultant and author with degrees from Harvard and MIT, wrote in a Sept. 18, 2014, blog that some people who lived too close to TV broadcast and radar towers developed symptoms of Microwave Sickness, a condition observed in military and industrial occupational settings during the Cold War. Microwave Sickness accelerated as warnings and recommendations were ignored, she wrote, and transmitters were placed closer to living and working environments; radiation exposure is driven more by proximity to the transmitter than by its total power output.
Whether the Newport towers could be a factor in the local cancer problem remains to be seen. The people of the Kuyahoora Valley deserve an answer, and the state health department should deliver it. – See more at: http://m.uticaod.com/article/20150305/OPINION/150309701/13312/OPINION/?Start=2#sthash.f47IlQwZ.dpuf”
– See more at: http://m.uticaod.com/article/20150305/OPINION/150309701/13312/OPINION#sthash.f47IlQwZ.dpuf
Dark Matters a Lot 
