![Escambia](https://darkmattersalot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/escambia1.png?w=497&h=251)
Lots of Microwave Radiation and Sinkholes (Dissoved CaCO3) in Escambia County, FL (left) and Santa Rosa County(Right), FL And a Cancer Cluster
Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties, Florida
In February 2001, The Pensacola News Journal reported that rates for several kinds of cancer, rates for birth defects, and rates for low birth weight babies were all elevated in Escabmia and Santa Rosa counties as compared with national rates. The article reported that federal regulators suspect arsenic, dioxin, lead, mercury and other substances from contaminated Superfund sites and manufacturing plants, Escambia Treating and Agrico, are to blame. Without adequate tracking of these substances and human health, it is difficult to determine whether the environment is linked to these elevated cancer rates.
Fallon, Churchill County, Nevada
Sixteen children have been diagnosed in Fallon with leukemia since 1997. Three have died; two relapsed in the summer of 2004. An investigation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded in 2003 that there are no links between environmental contaminants and the leukemia cases in Fallon. However, biomonitoring tests conducted by CDC found residents in Fallon had elevated levels of arsenic and tungsten in their urine. Arsenic is a known carcinogen, but has not been linked to leukemia. Little is know about the health effects of tungsten–it is currently being studied by the National Toxicology Program. A tracking network that collects data on environmental exposures and health effects could have helped discover the cluster earlier and aided health officials in their investigation.
More information:
I think that 6,400,000 Watt ARSR-4 is a VERY BAD ACTOR
Abstract
In this review we discuss alarming epidemiological and experimental data on possible carcinogenic effects of long term exposure to low intensity microwave (MW) radiation. Recently, a number of reports revealed that under certain conditions the irradiation by low intensity MW can substantially induce cancer progression in humans and in animal models. The carcinogenic effect of MW irradiation is typically manifested after long term (up to 10 years and more) exposure. Nevertheless, even a year of operation of a powerful base transmitting station for mobile communication reportedly resulted in a dramatic increase of cancer incidence among population living nearby. In addition, model studies in rodents unveiled a significant increase in carcinogenesis after 17-24 months of MW exposure both in tumor-prone and intact animals. To that, such metabolic changes, as overproduction of reactive oxygen species, 8-hydroxi-2-deoxyguanosine formation, or ornithine decarboxylase activation under exposure to low intensity MW confirm a stress impact of this factor on living cells. We also address the issue of standards for assessment of biological effects of irradiation. It is now becoming increasingly evident that assessment of biological effects of non-ionizing radiation based on physical (thermal) approach used in recommendations of current regulatory bodies, including the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines, requires urgent reevaluation. We conclude that recent data strongly point to the need for re-elaboration of the current safety limits for non-ionizing radiation using recently obtained knowledge. We also emphasize that the everyday exposure of both occupational and general public to MW radiation should be regulated based on a precautionary principles which imply maximum restriction of excessive exposure.
Normally I would not care except WE are made of calcium and our bloodstreams are like those streams the fish are dying in.
References:
High Powered Pulsed Radar Towers/Fish Kills here
I posted this song a year or so ago, I just had to play it again… Have your kids close their ears
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: underwater2web . <underwater2web@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:22 PM
Subject: Waimea reef destruction!! Really terrible turn for the worse!
To: Somebody, Anybody!
Hi ——-,
![SmWaimea11](https://darkmattersalot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/smwaimea11.jpg?w=300&h=228)
![???????????????????????????????](https://darkmattersalot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/smwaimea12.jpg?w=300&h=168)
From: ChemE Stewart <cheme911@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: Waimea reef destruction!! Really terrible turn for the worse!
To: The Quantum Vacuum (maybe it will listen)
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: underwater2web . <underwater2web@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:26 PM
Subject: Coral, Coral and more Coral on the Big Island!! Why we need it in KAUAI.
To: Somebody Who Might Do Something…
After 10 days scuba diving on the Big Island several thing were very clear. The coral along the Kona Coast completely covers the reefs down to 60 feet deep. This 100% coral cover is home to millions of fish, crabs, octopus and other marine life. The ecosystem is healthy and will delight tourist for many years to come!! We even dove in a submarine where we got to video a wide section of the reef within an hour and all looked great!!
![???????????????????????????????](https://darkmattersalot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/smhonau9.jpg?w=300&h=226)
![Lee2](https://darkmattersalot.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/lee2.png?w=497&h=251)
Lee County Florida (M)anatee Death Cluster. Area also has a concentration in sinkholes (red/green blobs – dissolved CaCO3) as well as a concentration of microwave Doppler weather, communication and cellular towers (station identifiers shown)
I have been very busy the past few days so not much chance to post any bleeding edge research, bad jokes or good music. So I have gone ahead and downloaded the Florida Manatee mortality data from 2013 and 2014 and used Google GeoCode to convert the addresses into latitude and longitude and then kml. Next to Melbourne, FL, the largest concentration of Manatee deaths is in Lee County. Lots of fish kills and algae blooms also. You can see from the graphic they also have a large cluster of sinkholes as well as many microwave weather, communications and cellular towers right near the waterways. To me as an engineer, the dissolving limestone is an indication of weakly non-ionizing pulsed radiation slowly dissolving the “Earth” around the towers.
I have come to the conclusion that nature hardly stands a chance around all of the overlapping EMF pollution humans are creating with all of this digital, pulsed microwave radiation. Those electrons have to dump that electromagnetic energy somewhere and the Earth and saltwater ways are a great conductor for that stuff. I believe this is gradually damaging our health as well as the surrounding wildlife and also dissolving the calcium based limestone around us. The radiation will increase during storms as the atmosphere scatters and dumps all of that energy to the Earth.
I have tried to concentrate mostly on wildlife on this blog, although I don’t believe humans will fare any better from all of this EMF based upon all of the research and my observations. Since I don’t have access to human health statistics, other than what I come across on the Internet, I have passed my radar database on to other professionals to look for correlations. I have been at this for a couple of years now, developing and refining my theory and putting the pieces together. I have concluded that humans have been irradiating themselves for over 100 years now, which has been a boom for the medical/drug industry as well as the military and telecommunications industries. 80% of West Africans now use cell phones and all that pulsed tower radiation is blaring 24/7 into the surrounding bats and birds and wildlife. That can’t be good.
I think we have gone way down the wrong road and our children are suffering for it.
Godspeed
I consider all of our new pulsed 3G & 4G cell towers the little cousins of our big pulsed Doppler Microwave Radar Towers. Since Doppler radar towers pulse at similar low frequencies (800 Hz – 1 kHz), with 20 to 30 times the power (~500,000 to 6,000,000 watts each pulse, 2-6 GHz carrier wave) and the fact the radiation gets “scattered” off the overhead atmosphere back to Earth & waterways, more so during storms, makes them very dangerous, especially when our dumbass government puts 15 or 20 radars in the same location, like in Kauai, HI or Melbourne, FL. That is why all of the calcium based sea-life along the coastlines are all suffering badly, including coral reefs, sea stars, sea urchins and lobsters, all around Doppler microwave radar towers and areas of high concentrations of RF/microwave/cellular frequencies. Not to mention the rest of the marine life. They tell us they are “low average power” when it fact they are astronomically high pulsed power. Read below and you will see it is the low frequency pulses doing the damage.
Model | NEXRAD WSR-88D |
Max Pulsed Power (Watts) | 475,000 |
Gain (dBi) | 45.5 |
Maximum ERP | 21,612,500 |
Carrier Frequency (MHz) | 2,850.0 |
RPM | 6.0 |
Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km | 13.4 |
Pulse Duration(uSec) | 1.6 |
Pulse Repetition Factor (Hz) | 800 |
Range Est. (Miles) | 143 |
This article is based on a paper written for a conference on “Mobile Phone Technology and its Consequences for Public Health”, organized by the University of Athens and held in Thessalonica on May 25th 2008.
The Cell Phone and the Cell – the Role of Calcium
Parent Category: Health
Electromagnetic fields have effects at the cell level
Weak non-ionizing radiation, such as that from mobile (cell) phones has biological effects, ranging from changes in brain function to the exacerbation of allergies and the induction and promotion of cancer. There have been many attempts to find the mechanisms and hundreds of scientific papers have been written about the changes they cause in the physiology and biochemistry of a wide range of living organisms (www.bioinitiative.org ). These include plants, animals and even single cells such as yeast and diatoms. This means that least some of the effects must be occurring at the level of individual cells. There is more than one mechanism, but the one I will discuss here is the electromagnetic removal of calcium ions (Coral reef skeletons are made of calcium carbonate) from cell membranes, which makes them become porous and leak. This simple observation can explain almost all of the known biological effects of weak electromagnetic radiation (Goldsworthy 2007).
Our bodies make good antennas (salt water waves breaking over a reef also make good antennas, collecting EMF)
The biological effects of electromagnetic radiation probably begin with the organism acting like the antenna of a radio. The radiation generates eddy currents flowing through it and (in the case of cell cultures) also through the surrounding medium. When they impinge on the delicate membranes that surround its individual cells, they disturb their ionic structure and destabilise them. The same is true of the membranes that divide cells into their various internal compartments and organelles.
The human body makes a good antenna since blood vessels, which are low resistance pathways filled with a highly conductive salty fluid, connect virtually all of its parts. Even cell membranes, which have a high resistance to DC, allow radio-frequencies through because of their high capacitance. So when you use a mobile phone, its signal will be transmitted to all parts of your body; nowhere is safe.
Radiation increases membrane permeability
Many scientific studies suggest that the first effect of the eddy currents is to generate small alternating voltages across the cell membranes, which increase their permeability. This can have serious metabolic consequences as unwanted substances diffuse into and out of cells unhindered, and materials in different parts of the cell, that should be kept separate, become mixed. But how do these tiny alternating voltages increase membrane permeability?
The answer lies in their ability to remove calcium ions from the membrane surface. We have known since the work of Suzanne Bawin and her co-workers (Bawin et al. 1975) that electromagnetic radiation that is far too weak to cause significant heating can nevertheless remove radioactively labelled calcium ions from cell membranes. Later, Carl Blackman showed that this occurs only with weak radiation, and then only within one or more “amplitude windows“, above and below which there is little or no effect (Blackman et al. 1982; Blackman 1990).
How weak fields remove calcium ions from membranes
Calcium ions are positively charged calcium atoms. Free calcium ions normally occur in calcium salts but, like other positive ions, they can also bind to the negatively charged membranes of living cells. These membrane-bound ions are in chemical equilibrium with the corresponding free ions in the surrounding medium, but there is a disproportionately large amount of calcium because it has two positive charges (i.e. it is divalent), which attracts it more strongly to the negative membrane. Most of the other readily available ions in living cells (e.g. potassium) have only one charge (i.e. they are monovalent). However, the extra charges on the divalent ions such as calcium and magnesium are literally their undoing. They let weak alternating electromagnetic fields remove them selectively from the membrane, which can have dire metabolic consequences.
Frequency effects
If they are to remove calcium in this way, the fields must be alternating. Low frequencies work best because they allow more time for dislodged calcium ions to diffuse clear of the cell membrane and be replaced by different ions, before the field reverses. Pulses are more effective than smooth sine waves because their rapid rise and fall times catapult the ions quickly away from the membrane and leave even more time for them to be replaced by different ions before the field reverses. This is probably why the pulsed radiation from mobile phones can be particularly damaging.