I’ll have to admit that I have predicted some pretty crazy things from my version of M Theory, right? If you get right down to it, my predictions pretty much say that mainstream geophysics has this place pretty much bass-ackwards. Mainstream physics thinks all of these Ice Halos are just an optical effect. Hell, my theory says some of these halos have as much energy as possibly the Earth all curled up in a string with tension passing through the center of those halos and sun dogs, which are really lensed pairs in my therory. And all those cirrus clouds, well, they are just condensing wisps of water vapor along the surface of that high energy string of vacuum energy.
So as crazy as it sounds, if you were to fly a plane or rocket into one of those Sun Dogs within the cirrus clouds, you ought to get maybe some gravitational turbulence and waves or possibly some cirrus clouds shooting into the sky as that string interacts with the metal surface and heat radiation from the rocket. So here is what happened during the launch in the video above:
“When the rocket penetrated the cirrus, shock waves rippled through the cloud and destroyed the alignment of the ice crystals,” explains Cowley. “This extinguished the sundog.” The sundog’s destruction was understood. The events that followed, however, were not. “A luminous column of white light appeared next to the Atlas V and followed the rocket up into the sky,” says Cowley. “We’d never seen anything like it.” Cowley and colleague Robert Greenler set to work figuring out what the mystery-column was. Somehow, shock waves from the rocket must have scrambled the ice crystals to produce the ‘rocket halo.’ But how? Computer models of sunlight shining through ice crystals tilted in every possible direction failed to explain the SDO event.
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2011-02-solar-dynamics-observatory-sundog-mystery.html#jCp
Now those optical physics boys are going to come up with some more of their perfectly arranged hexagonal ice crystals again to try and explain all of that. So go right ahead boys, those things come in all shapes and sizes to fit your low energy version of this universe.
Mercury on the date of the video
The image of Mercury in the video is mirrored and enlarged by lensing. The Crescent seen is based upon the phase of the Mercury/time of year.
HOW MANY LENSING PAIRS WE HAVE TO EXPECT?
As discussed in Sec.1, the most evident signature of a cosmic string is to produce a strip of multiple images along its path. This would be the first feature to look for in any dedicated search for cosmic strings within large astronomical surveys.
History of Gravitational Lensing
The first written account of the deflection of light by gravity appeared in the “Berliner Astronomisches Jahrbuch auf das Jahr 1804” in an article entitled: “Über die Ablenkung eines Lichtstrahls von seiner geradlinigen Bewegung, durch die Attraktion eines Weltkörpers, an welchem er nahe vorbeigeht” (“On the Deflection of a Light Ray from its Straight Motion due to the Attraction of a World Body which it Passes Closely”) [175]. Johann Soldner – a German geodesist, mathematician and astronomer then working at the Berlin Observatory – explored this effect and inferred that a light ray close to the solar limb would be deflected by an angle 
= 0.84 arcsec. It is very interesting to read how carefully and cautiously he investigated this idea and its consequences on practical astronomy.
In the year 1911 – more than a century later – Albert Einstein [50] directly addressed the influence of gravity on light (“Über den Einfluß der Schwerkraft auf die Ausbreitung des Lichtes” (“On the Influence of Gravity on the Propagation of Light”). At this time, the General Theory of Relativity was not fully developed. This is the reason why Einstein obtained – unaware of the earlier result – the same value for the deflection angle as Soldner had calculated with Newtonian physics. In this paper, Einstein found 
for the deflection angle of a ray grazing the sun (here 
and 
are the mass and the radius of the sun, 
and 
are the velocity of light and the gravitational constant, respectively). Einstein emphasized his wish that astronomers investigate this question (“Es wäre dringend zu wünschen, daß sich Astronomen der hier aufgerollten Frage annähmen, auch wenn die im vorigen gegebenen Überlegungen ungenügend fundiert oder gar abenteuerlich erscheinen sollten.” (“It would be very desirable that astronomers address the question unrolled here, even if the considerations should seem to be insufficiently founded or entirely speculative.”) Recently it was discovered that Einstein had derived the lens equation, the possibility of a double image and the magnifications of the images in a notebook in the year 1912 [153
]. In 1913 Einstein even contacted the director of the Mt. Wilson Observatory, George Ellery Hale, and asked him whether it would be possible to measure positions of stars near the sun during the day in order to establish the deflection effect of the sun.
See [51] to view a facsimile of a letter Einstein wrote to G.E. Hale on October 14, 1913. In the letter, Einstein asked Hale whether it would be possible to determine the light deflection at the solar limb during the day. However, there was a “wrong” value of the deflection angle in a sketch Einstein included in the letter.
There actually were plans to test Einstein’s wrong prediction of the deflection angle during a solar eclipse in 1914 on the Russian Crimea peninsula. However, when the observers were already in Russia, World War I broke out and they were captured by Russian soldiers [32]. So, fortunately for Einstein, the measurement of the deflection angle at the solar limb had to be postponed for a few years.
With the completion of the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein was the first to derive the correct deflection angle 
of a light ray passing at a distance 
from an object of mass 
as
where 
is the constant of gravity and 
is the velocity of light. The additional factor of two (compared to the “Newtonian” value) reflects the spatial curvature (which is missed if photons are just treated as particles). With the solar values for radius and mass Einstein obtained [52, 53]:
It is common wisdom now that the determination of this value to within 20% during the solar eclipse in 1919 by Arthur Eddington and his group was the second observational confirmation of General Relativity [47] and the basis of Einstein’s huge popularity starting in the 1920s. (The first one had been the explanation of Mercury’s perihelion shift.) Recently, the value predicted by Einstein was confirmed to an accuracy better than 0.02% [107].
In the following decades, light deflection or gravitational lensing was only very rarely the topic of a research paper: In 1924, Chwolson [39] mentioned the idea of a “fictitous double star” and the mirror-reversed nature of the secondary image. He also mentioned the symmetric case of star exactly behind star, resulting in a circular image. Einstein also reported in 1936 about the appearance of a “luminous circle” for perfect alignment between source and lens [54], and of two magnified images for slightly displaced positions1. Today such a lens configuration is called “Einstein-ring”, although more correctly it should be called “Chwolson-ring”. Influenced by Einstein, Fritz Zwicky [210, 211] pointed out in 1937 that galaxies (“extragalactic nebulae”) are much more likely to be gravitationally lensed than stars and that one can use the gravitational lens effect as a “natural telescope”.
In the 1960s, a few partly independent theoretical studies showed the usefulness of lensing for astronomy [95, 111, 112, 123, 146, 147]. In particular, Sjur Refsdal derived the basic equations of gravitational lens theory and subsequently showed how the gravitational lens effect can be used to determine Hubble’s constant by measuring the time delay between two lensed images. He followed up this work with interesting applications of lensing [149, 148, 150]. The mathematical foundation of how a light bundle is distorted on its passage through the universe had been derived in the context of gravitational radiation even before [157].
Originally, gravitational lensing was discussed for stars or for galaxies. When quasars were discovered in the 1960s, Barnothy [14] was the first to connect them with the gravitational lens effect. In the late 60s/early 70s, a few groups and individuals explored various aspects of lensing further, for example, statistical effects of local inhomogeneities on the propagation of light [71, 72, 143]; lensing applied to quasars and clusters of galaxies [42, 130, 158]; development of a formalism for transparent lenses [30, 40]; and the effect of an inhomogeneous universe on the distance-redshift relations [46].
But only in 1979 did the whole field receive a real boost when the first double quasar was discovered and confirmed to be a real gravitational lens by Walsh, Carswell & Weymann [193]. This discovery, and the development of lensing since then, will be described in Section 4.
- Going further. There are a few historic accounts of lensing which are more detailed than the one presented here. Some examples can be found in [155, 167]and [194]. The complete history of gravitational lensing has yet to be written.
I am more of a visual guy, I get bored with trying to put Nature into an equation when there appears to be lots of quantum vacuum available for the variety of life that we see around us. I liken the standard model to structural engineering, it is kinda BORING. Our lives are made up around those collapsing wave functions of this quantum dark/vacuum energy, which keeps life EXCITING and short.
It’s not about hot and cold guys, its about more or less vacuum. EZ Peazy as my 9 year old would say. I am sort of embarrassed because it seems so simple to me now..
Inside and Outside ellipses are Lensed Images of Mercury & Venus Orbits. (They have dust/dark matter in their orbital paths). Top Inverted arc is a lensing of a crescent of a Planet?
From Here:
On certain still afternoons, if you are lucky,you will see a pair of rainbow spots left and right of the sun. Known as ‘Sun Dogs’, these are the first elements to appear of an ice halo- a thin rainbow circle around the sun. Caused by light passing through ice crystals high in the atmosphere, Sun Dogs appear 22.5 degrees left and right of the sun, just outside the bright 22 degree halo. Sometimes a second larger halo appears 46 degrees from the sun, with a distinctive arc on top, the whole arrangement looking strangely similar to the ancient glyph for mercury.Amazingly these two ice halos beautifully match the mean orbits of the inner two planets Mercury and Venus seen from the surface of the earth. This means that when you look at a double ice halo, you are really seeing the spheres of the mean orbits of Mercury and Venus, hanging in the sky. There they are!
From Here:
But there are even more uncanny placements in the solar system, and they have their echoes right here on Earth. When the atmospheric conditions are right, tiny ice crystals fill the atmosphere. They bend light coming in from the sun at a certain angle, creating a halo around the sun at an angle of twenty-two degrees [Wrong: Cosmic String creates lensed image and ice crystals]. This is an ice halo. A double ice halo appears when other crystals bend light to forty-six degrees[Wrong: Cosmic String creates lensed image and ice crystals]. On very cold, clear days, with a lot of ice bumbling around in the sky, entire sets of curved lines can appear around the sun, but the picture above shows the full glory of a double halo.Meanwhile, we see the sun every day, but the sun obscures the planets that move around it. They move around it at different rates, and at different distances from the sun. The two that are closer to the sun than we are, and whose orbits can be inscribed in our sky, move around the sun at about what we would see as twenty-two degrees and forty-six degrees from the sun. If you see an ice halo around the sun, its path is approximately the same as the mean orbit of Mercury. If you’re lucky enough to see the faint impression of the outer halo (In this image, it’s near the number two), you’re seeing, roughly, the mean orbit of Venus.There is no way the light that refracts from ice crystals can have an effect on the orbits on the Earth, Venus, and Mercury, making each of them line up in this precise way. So we can be forgiven for considering this just a bit on the spooky side[Wrong: It is a lensed image so that is why they line up in a precise way]. Of course, if they hadn’t lined up in the sky the way they do, we’d never have noticed — we’d have gone about our business until we found something else that was a coincidence. Still, even without the mystical connection, it’s amazing to look up in the sky on a cold day, see a circle around the sun, and realize that a distant planet is roughly somewhere along that circle.
Strange Discovery: Giant Dust Ring Found Near Venus Orbit
Scientists have found a huge, diffuse ring of dust near the orbit of Venus, marking the second time such a structure has been discovered in our solar system.The dust ring stretches about 137 million miles (220 million kilometers) from end to end, though it’s just 10 percent denser than the background cloud that pervades interplanetary space and produces the glow known as zodiacal light, researchers said.
So I looked for these references when I realized I was seeing a magnified/lensed image of the crescent of A PLANET in that last video post. It is not a coincidence those halos match Venus and Mercury’s orbits. The reason those ice halos line up with the orbits of Mercury and Venus is because they are a LENSED IMAGE from those cosmic strings passing in between the observer and the Sun, Mercury and Venus. The dust within the orbital path of Venus and Mercury is also lensed. These cosmic strings create our weather through ionization and condensing within our atmosphere and they are gradually taking us all back to the vacuum from whence we came.
Answer: When he cannot even see with a Gravitational Lense.
P.S. His shortsightedness is holding back humanity IN A BIG WAY
HOW MANY LENSING PAIRS WE HAVE TO EXPECT?
As discussed in Sec.1, the most evident signature of a cosmic string is to produce a strip of multiple images along its path. This would be the first feature to look for in any dedicated search for cosmic strings within large astronomical surveys.
Guys, I think that second lens above the Sun’s lens IS THE LENSING OF EITHER MERCURY OR VENUS
Thankfully my ADD allows me to hyperfocus on one thing for awhile… To me it appears these “Polar Vortex’s” we are getting now are accompanied by some pretty amazing gravitational lensing and lensed pairs and stringy cusps seen a month ago. Of course accepted geophysics has made up our own special science on Earth to explain these “phenomena” through multiple combinations of hexagonal ice crystals that magically align themselves in these intricate elliptical patterns in order to try and explain it away. It makes for a kinder, gentler, more soothing brand of physics for the school children. It is really too bad they are WRONG. You can sense the vacuum, or draft in the video by the rush of wind by the microphone. To me, there is plenty of energy there for a grand unified theory, if others would JUST OPEN THEIR EYES. We have plenty of equations, it is time TO SENSE THE EQUATIONS, AND BEHOLD THE QUANTUM VACUUM. The sooner a noted physicist fesses up, the better off everyone will be. I am just an engineer with an attitude. Those sirens in the background are an indication of INCREASED UNCERTAINTY as space is “wrinkled” and not smooth in the area… Let’s just hope there are no major Earthquakes as a result. To me the lower the pressure, the higher the local vacuum concentration and greater the chance for seismic events and severe weather due to accelerated decay. I believe we can thank either Jupiter or ISON for this increase in vacuum and the “Polar Vortexes” we are experiencing.
This one was in the atmosphere a couple weeks before the Japan Earthquake…Lots of condensing along that string.
Maybe somebody should KEEP AN EYE ON THOSE ORBITING STRINGS, I think they might give somebody an ASSWHOOPER’N
I found a good old paper linking low pressure systems to Earthquakes, which supports my research
Click on the text to read more.
Now you see what THEY are trying to tell us, RIGHT?
We ARE NOT ALONE guys, just lonely. At some point physicists will wake up and realize this is a National Security Issue, but I am not sure how long that will take. They should then realize what is bending that Doppler radiation in the atmosphere and why it is very dangerous to pump that EMF into the atmosphere 24/7. There will be lots of pride to swallow, egos to deal with and lots of pain and anguish. It might be easier to just keep denying it all, I don’t know. I am just getting the monkey off my back and for some reason you guys, whoever you are, keep coming back for more.
Godspeed
I had to drive 10 hours in a car yesterday, so not much writing, but a lot of thinking.
Leukemia Cluster Site near Navy Radar, also all areas with Radars were centers for West Nile in Mosquitos
Adding to the strange mix of real and suspected exposures in Fallon is electromagnetic radiation (EMF) from a nearby high-powered, long-range navigation (loran) radiofrequency transmitter. Residents’ EMF exposure increases during wet weather, according to Wiemels. The tower, which transmits frequencies ranging from 90 to 110 kilohertz, is part of an antiquated nationwide network for determining a craft’s location by triangulating signals received from distinct transmitters. Although modern GPS has largely rendered the World War II-era technology obsolete, the tower remains in place and operational. “When it rains, the whole basin where Fallon is located becomes an antenna,” Wiemels says. A drought earlier in the 1990s ended with wetter years, including a very rainy 1997, during which the basin was soggy all winter, Wiemels has learned. Some studies of leukemia and EMF have found an association, while others have not. Wiemels plans to review water table and weather records to gauge what might have been a significant EMF exposure for local residents prior to the onset of the cancer cluster
That description sounds exactly like the theory I have been developing for the past year. During low pressure events, I think the atmosphere is discharging that extra energy as weakly ionizing radiation to all biology below due to the increase in vacuum energy. I think in Melbourne, Florida, the atmosphere is discharging much of the extra Doppler energy from those three radar towers into that Indian River Lagoon during hazy skies and storms, gradually damaging all biology in a chronic way.
I’m in a funk. I lost my dog and I lost my friend.
If you use your imagination just a bit, you might imagine at least two strings in this video, orbiting at close to perpendicular to each other like that previous research paper I posted mentioned. Those streaky clouds/contrails are the condensing that is occurring at their “surface” as the gaseous atmosphere passes around the strings and as they decay The halo is from gravitational lensing of the Sun and the two “Sun Dogs” are lensed pairs. The extreme condensation, probably all the way to a Bose Einstein Condensate along the surface of those strings are creating the hexagonal ice crystals.
This video shows a couple of lensed pairs from what I can tell. I think you can tell the energy of that string by the diameter of that lens around the Sun. My calculator does not have that function built in, but here is a good research paper on cosmic strings. There is no way you are going to convince me hexagonal ice crystals are making that circumhorizontal arc. Those massive strings appear to align themselves “gravitatively” (I like that word) between the Earth Brane and Solar Brane. I am thinking that over the next months those strings decay into the jet streams and form our low pressure weather systems as they gradually break up and decay around us.
I don’t have the budget for a fancy 2 billion dollar magnetometer so I have to resort to Youtube and let my mind fill in the blanks. Others on the Internet are calling these “chemtrails”, but quite honestly I do not see a very good return on investment in spraying chemicals in the atmosphere 24/7, it takes a lot of jet fuel and chemicals. I am thinking it is these strings from our decaying quantum gravity field that are the reason we are all here as well as the reason we are not around here for very long. We seem to be caught in a never-ending cosmic wash and rinse cycle between our 5% and the other 95%. I am not ruling out a quantum God Brane of the universe, because, quite frankly, if I am right, I could not have come up with this by myself. My ball cap is off to the string theory dudes (and crop circle dudes…) if this happens to be correct, if not I hope you at least enjoy my search and don’t live near a Doppler radar tower…
Godspeed.
Citrus Cancer Locations in Florida (Red Areas). Doppler Radars are colored Circles
Even before being hit by the disease, Florida’s orange, grapefruit and specialty fruit crops faced many threats, including hurricanes, frost and a fungus that causes canker disease. The crops have been declining since the mid-1990s.[Most of the NEXRAD & TDWR Radars were all installed in the Early to mid 1990’s]
It is hard for me to believe nobody has done any long term studies on these Radars. It appears to me they may be damaging all biology around them in a VERY BIG and chronic way.Must be lots of money to be made in radars, much less to be made in 10 year studies.
Dark Matters a Lot 
